Colorado Patent Attorney Discusses Design Patents – Part 2 of 3

Colorado Patent Attorney Discusses Design Patents – Part 2 of 3

Watch Video Interview at This Link: Colorado Patent Attorney Discusses Design Patents

Interviewer: And how long is a design patent valid?

Patent Attorney: A design patent is valid for 14 years from the date of issue. This is different than utility patents, which are valid 20 years from date of filing. Note, that I said “date of filing” for the utility patent – and not “date of issue” as for the design patent.

Interviewer: Good point. I see that the article says “design patents are often a forgotten form of intellectual property despite the fact that they have been available to inventors and designers for over 150 years.” Why are these so often overlooked?

Patent Attorney: Design patents offer different protection than utility patents. Often, design patents are seen as offering less protection than utility patents. But the key here is “different,” not necessarily less protection.

Interviewer: What do you mean by different protection?

Patent Attorney: It’s important to understand, that design patents only protect the ornamental appearance exactly as pictured and nothing more (perhaps trivial variations). As such, design patents are often said to offer less protection than a utility patent.

Interviewer: But you said that design patents offer “different” protection – not necessarily “less” protection.

Patent Attorney: That’s right, the article makes a good point that design patents can be very valuable. The article points out as good examples, Apple’s iPhone graphics and the original Coca-Cola bottle. The article also points out that design patents are a cost-effective way to protect intellectual property. I would add that design patent applications are often examined much faster than utility patent applications, and thus may issue as enforceable patents long before a utility patent issues.

For part 3 of 3, follow this link: Colorado Patent Attorney Discusses Design Patents – Part 3 of 3

Colorado Patent Attorney Discusses Design Patents – Part 1 of 3

Colorado Patent Attorney Discusses Design Patents – Part 1 of 3

View the video interview here: Colorado Patent Attorney Discusses Design Patents

Introduction: This morning we are interviewing Denver-area patent attorney Mark Trenner. Mark has been practicing as a patent attorney in Colorado for almost 14 years; the past 9 years at Trenner Law Firm. While his practice focuses primarily on helping small businesses protect their inventions with patents, Trenner Law Firm assists clients build out all aspects of their intellectual property portfolio, including copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets.

Interviewer: The National Law Review recently published an article titled “Design Patent Basics.” Mark, aren’t all patents for product designs?

Patent Attorney: That’s a good question, one I get all the time. There are actually three types of patent applications inventors can file in the United States: utility patent applications, plant patent applications, and as discussed in this article, design patent applications.

Interviewer: I didn’t realize that. So what is a design patent?

Patent Attorney: In the United States, a design patent protects the unique ornamental appearance of a product, but not the function. Think of a lamp for example. The function of a lamp is to produce light, usually with an electric light bulb. The common electric light bulb that you can buy in your local hardware store can’t be patented. But if you have a unique design for the lamp – maybe the lamp base or the lamp shade – you may be able to apply for a design patent. Or as the article discusses, “a design patent can protect the shape of a bottle or the pattern on the bottom of a shoe.”

For Part 2 of 3 Follow This Link: Colorado Patent Attorney Discusses Design Patents – Part 2 of 3

Denver Patent Attorney Discusses Patent Trolls – Part 3 of 3

Denver Patent Attorney Discusses Patent Trolls – Part 3 of 3

View the video interview here: Denver Patent Attorney Discusses Patent Trolls

Interviewer: I thought the article was about Vermont?

Patent Attorney: Yes, the article explains that Nebraska is the second state going after these so-called frivolous lawsuits.

Interviewer: And Vermont is the first state?

Patent Attorney: Right, apparently Nebraska was inspired by Vermont, who filed a lawsuit in May against a patent holding company after several Vermont businesses were threatened. Apparently even two Vermont charities were threatened by the patent holding company.

Interviewer: Are any of the sates successful in deterring patent trolls?

Patent Attorney: I think that is yet to be seen. But, a lot of companies, and even some charities according to this article, are being threatened with litigation, and so it is definitely making the headlines lately.

Interviewer: Are there any laws specifically on point?

Patent Attorney: The article does mention the use of Vermont’s Consumer Protection Act, and legislation was also passed in May in Vermont giving someone accused of patent infringement the right to counter-sue if it is in bad faith. Of course, proving bad faith is a whole other issue in itself.

Interviewer: Sounds like we will be hearing a lot more about patent trolls . . . . Thank you, I think that’s all we have time for today. For more information, be sure to visit Trenner Law Firm’s website at www.us-patentattorney.com and Mark Trenner’s blog over at www.ipatentattorney.org

Denver Patent Attorney Discusses Patent Trolls – Part 2 of 3

Denver Patent Attorney Discusses Patent Trolls – Part 2 of 3

View the video interview here: Denver Patent Attorney Discusses Patent Trolls

Interviewer: Why aren’t they considered to be patent trolls?

Patent Attorney: Universities and research laboratories are generally considered to be making developments and advancements for the good of the people. While they have the resources and capabilities to conduct important research, such as cancer and other preventative disease research, they typically are not well suited to deploy any products. Instead, these laboratories collaborate with businesses that do have the means to develop, test, and bring products to market. So no, these laboratories are generally not considered to be patent trolls.

Interviewer: I see, so why the negative connotation for patent trolls?

Patent Attorney: Well you’ve probably read in some of the articles I’ve linked to on my Twitter account, that these patent trolls obtain patents and then go after companies that are actually making products, and seek out damages, even though there was really no damage to the patent troll. The patent troll never tried to bring a product to market. They are just trying to collect money and even worse, stop legitimate companies from manufacturing products.

Interviewer: So what are states doing to stop these patent trolls?

Patent Attorney: It’s interesting, the article says that Nebraska sent a letter to one of the law firms allegedly representing patent trolls, to leave Nebraska businesses alone. The article says that the letter apparently “warned [the law firm] that it would face serious consequences under Nebraska law if it engaged in ‘baseless harassment’ of Nebraska businesses or pursued ‘costly and destructive litigation’.”

For Part 3 of 3 Follow This Link: Denver Patent Attorney Discusses Patent Trolls – Part 3 of 3